Democracy, Voter Rights, and Federal Power: Difference between revisions

From ALEC Exposed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
adjusting styles for mobile view
fixing link syntax
Line 23: Line 23:
[[Image:Fact Sheet.jpg|left|100px]]
[[Image:Fact Sheet.jpg|left|100px]]


[http://alecexposed.org/w/images/a/a7/ALEC_on_Democracy.pdf Download a one-page fact sheet on ALEC and democracy here].
[[Media:ALEC_on_Democracy.pdf|Download a one-page fact sheet on ALEC and democracy here]].
----
----
[[Image:Take_Action!.png|left|115px|link=http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/632/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=10002]]
[[Image:Take_Action!.png|left|115px|link=http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/632/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=10002]]
Line 39: Line 39:
| style="color:#000000; padding:0 0.75em;" |[[Image:wethecorporations.png|left|140px]]
| style="color:#000000; padding:0 0.75em;" |[[Image:wethecorporations.png|left|140px]]
<big>'''These bills limit the democratic influence of average Americans in favor of corporations by:'''</big><br>
<big>'''These bills limit the democratic influence of average Americans in favor of corporations by:'''</big><br>
* [http://alecexposed.org/w/images/d/d9/7G16-VOTER_ID_ACT_Exposed.pdf Disenfranchising disabled, low-income, elderly, people-of-color, and student voters] who move more frequently or do not drive, by requiring all voters show a state ID at the polls -- even though counties have traditionally accepted other proofs of residence without any significant problems.
* [[Media:7G16-VOTER_ID_ACT_Exposed.pdf|Disenfranchising disabled, low-income, elderly, people-of-color, and student voters]] who move more frequently or do not drive, by requiring all voters show a state ID at the polls -- even though counties have traditionally accepted other proofs of residence without any significant problems.
* [http://alecexposed.org/w/images/a/ae/7G9-Resolution_Opposing_Taxpayer_Financed_Political_Campaigns_Exposed.pdf Opposing public financing of elections] designed to reduce the influence of moneyed interests, and justifying their position with the plainly untrue assertion that "campaign contributions have no effect upon legislative behavior."
* [[Media:7G9-Resolution_Opposing_Taxpayer_Financed_Political_Campaigns_Exposed.pdf|Opposing public financing of elections]] designed to reduce the influence of moneyed interests, and justifying their position with the plainly untrue assertion that "campaign contributions have no effect upon legislative behavior."
* [http://alecexposed.org/w/images/f/f2/7G4-Resolution_in_Support_of_the_Citizens_United_Decision_Exposed.pdf Anticipating unlimited secret spending in the 2010 midterm elections] and releasing a resolution opposing the disclosure of donors, before many others recognized how corporations, CEOs, and corporate front groups would hide behind non-disclosure rules and funnel hundreds of millions of dollars into the 2010 elections, with more to come in 2012.
* [[Media:7G4-Resolution_in_Support_of_the_Citizens_United_Decision_Exposed.pdf|Anticipating unlimited secret spending in the 2010 midterm elections]] and releasing a resolution opposing the disclosure of donors, before many others recognized how corporations, CEOs, and corporate front groups would hide behind non-disclosure rules and funnel hundreds of millions of dollars into the 2010 elections, with more to come in 2012.
* [http://alecexposed.org/w/images/7/7a/7G2-Model_Resolution_Restricting_the_Use_of_Random_Sampling_Exposed.pdf Opposing the use of statistical sampling] to get an accurate count of urban people of color and immigrants in the U.S. Census, although many modern countries use such cost-effective and accurate tools to conduct their census. Some politicians have expressed concern that this would increase the number of electoral votes and districts to favor Democrats.
* [[Media:7G2-Model_Resolution_Restricting_the_Use_of_Random_Sampling_Exposed.pdf|Opposing the use of statistical sampling]] to get an accurate count of urban people of color and immigrants in the U.S. Census, although many modern countries use such cost-effective and accurate tools to conduct their census. Some politicians have expressed concern that this would increase the number of electoral votes and districts to favor Democrats.
* [http://alecexposed.org/w/images/1/16/7G11-RESOLUTION_SUPPORTING_THE_FIRST_AMENDMENT_IN_ELECTIONS_Exposed.pdf Opposing "false statement" laws passed by states] designed to ensure that campaign ads do not mislead voters with false statements.
* [[Media:7G11-RESOLUTION_SUPPORTING_THE_FIRST_AMENDMENT_IN_ELECTIONS_Exposed.pdf|Opposing "false statement" laws passed by states]] designed to ensure that campaign ads do not mislead voters with false statements.
<br>
<br>
''To see a full list of these bills, [[Bills Affecting Civil Rights and Our Democracy|click here]]''
''To see a full list of these bills, [[Bills Affecting Civil Rights and Our Democracy|click here]]''
Line 66: Line 66:
| style="color:#000000; padding:0 0.75em;" |[[Image:Point.png|left|70px]][[media:Democracy,_Voter_Rights_and_Federal_Power.zip|<big>Click  here for a zip file of '''Democracy, Voter Rights and Federal Power'''  bills</big>]]
| style="color:#000000; padding:0 0.75em;" |[[Image:Point.png|left|70px]][[media:Democracy,_Voter_Rights_and_Federal_Power.zip|<big>Click  here for a zip file of '''Democracy, Voter Rights and Federal Power'''  bills</big>]]


Looking for the resolution voted on  by ALEC politicians and corporations in favor of the Supreme Court's  decision in the "Citizens United" case?  It's  [http://alecexposed.org/w/images/7/7a/7G4-Resolution_in_Support_of_the_Citizens_United_Decision_Exposed.pdf here.]
Looking for the resolution voted on  by ALEC politicians and corporations in favor of the Supreme Court's  decision in the "Citizens United" case?  It's  [[Media:7G4-Resolution_in_Support_of_the_Citizens_United_Decision_Exposed.pdf|here]].
<br>
<br>
[[Image:Full list.png|left|70px]]
[[Image:Full list.png|left|70px]]
Line 74: Line 74:
----
----


<big>''For  descriptions of some of these bills, [[#How are ALEC corporations limiting democratic participation?| scroll down or click here]].''</big><br/>
<big>''For  descriptions of some of these bills, [[#How are ALEC corporations limiting democratic participation?|scroll down or click here]].''</big><br/>
|}
|}
</div>
</div>
Line 89: Line 89:
Though the  number of states with strict voter ID laws  [http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/2012_summary_of_voting_law_changes/  quadrupled in 2011], there has been some pushback. Under Section 5 of  the 1965 Voting Rights Act, several states with a history of racially  motivated voting rights discrimination require federal pre-approval for  changes to voting procedures and practices, and the U.S. Department of  Justice has refused to approve voter ID laws passed by South Carolina  and Texas. In Wisconsin,  [http://www.prwatch.org/news/2012/07/11649/second-judge-finds-wis-voter-id-law-unconstitutional  two state judges] have found the law violates the state constitution's  express protections for voting rights. A Pennsylvania court upheld that  state's law but it is being appealed to the state's supreme court. Other  challenges to the laws are pending.
Though the  number of states with strict voter ID laws  [http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/2012_summary_of_voting_law_changes/  quadrupled in 2011], there has been some pushback. Under Section 5 of  the 1965 Voting Rights Act, several states with a history of racially  motivated voting rights discrimination require federal pre-approval for  changes to voting procedures and practices, and the U.S. Department of  Justice has refused to approve voter ID laws passed by South Carolina  and Texas. In Wisconsin,  [http://www.prwatch.org/news/2012/07/11649/second-judge-finds-wis-voter-id-law-unconstitutional  two state judges] have found the law violates the state constitution's  express protections for voting rights. A Pennsylvania court upheld that  state's law but it is being appealed to the state's supreme court. Other  challenges to the laws are pending.
----
----
'''This information is available for download as a one-page fact sheet [http://alecexposed.org/w/images/a/a7/ALEC_on_Democracy.pdf here].'''
'''This information is available for download as a one-page fact sheet [[Media:ALEC_on_Democracy.pdf|here]].'''
----
----
|}
|}

Revision as of 19:42, 22 February 2017

Efforts to limit democratic participation, facilitate big money in politics, and override the federal government

Democracy, Voter Rights, and Federal Power
This page shows how ALEC bills or resolutions would disenfranchise Americans and give corporations even more power to use their vast financial resources to influence elections in our democracy. These "model bills" include the infamous "Voter ID" bills pushed through this year by new governors, many of whom have ties to ALEC.

Through ALEC, corporations have both a VOICE and a VOTE on specific state laws affecting your voting rights and elections through these model bills. Do you?

How do these bills limit democratic participation?

These bills limit the democratic influence of average Americans in favor of corporations by:


To see a full list of these bills, click here

John Nichols on ALEC & Democracy

Watch John Nichols, writer for The Nation magazine, discuss ALEC and the corporate efforts to undermine democracy.

Watch other ALEC Exposed experts here.
Read John Nichols' article in The Nation here.

READ the "Model Bills" HERE

Click here for a zip file of Democracy, Voter Rights and Federal Power bills

Looking for the resolution voted on by ALEC politicians and corporations in favor of the Supreme Court's decision in the "Citizens United" case? It's here.

For a full list of individual bills from this section, click here


For descriptions of some of these bills, scroll down or click here.

ALEC Inspired Voter Suppression Measures Take Off

After Barack Obama swept into office in November of 2008 with the energized support of youth and African Americans, suddenly "voter fraud" became a deep concern for many in the Republican party -- despite no evidence fraud occurred in any statistically significant way. When Republicans emerged from the November 2010 elections with new majorities in statehouses across the country, a total of [ 37 states saw strict voter ID laws introduced in 2011 and 2012. Many of those proposals contained elements of the ALEC "model" voter ID act, which imposes new burdens on the right to vote by requiring voters show state-issued ID cards that approximately 11 percent of voting-age American citizens do not possess. That number is even higher for students, African Americans, low-income, and older citizens. Though the ALEC "model" provides for free ID cards, the Brennan Center for Justice has found that the process of obtaining an ID presents significant difficulties, with voters lacking access to transportation, living dozens of miles from the nearest ID-issuing office (many of which have irregular and limited hours), and facing costs and headaches in obtaining supporting documentation like birth certificates. Additionally, the in-person voter fraud these laws might prevent happens at an infinitesimally small rate -- meaning that on balance, the purported benefits of the law (stopping voter fraud) do not outweigh the costs of disenfranchising as many as 21 million American citizens.

Photo voter ID bills were signed into law in eight states — Alabama, Kansas, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania — and passed by referendum in Mississippi. Additionally, Minnesota's legislature approved a ballot measure to amend the state constitution to require ID at the polls.

Though the number of states with strict voter ID laws quadrupled in 2011, there has been some pushback. Under Section 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, several states with a history of racially motivated voting rights discrimination require federal pre-approval for changes to voting procedures and practices, and the U.S. Department of Justice has refused to approve voter ID laws passed by South Carolina and Texas. In Wisconsin, two state judges have found the law violates the state constitution's express protections for voting rights. A Pennsylvania court upheld that state's law but it is being appealed to the state's supreme court. Other challenges to the laws are pending.


This information is available for download as a one-page fact sheet here.



More Helpful Resources

Additional resources on ALEC's corporate agenda:

Learn MORE about the "Model Bills" ALEC Corporations Are Backing to Rewrite YOUR Rights

The Center for Media and Democracy analyzed the bills ALEC politicians and corporations voted for. More analysis is available below and also at ALEC Exposed's sister sites, PRWatch and SourceWatch.

Join the Conversation!

ALEC Exposed is a project of the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD). CMD does NOT accept donations from for-profit corporations or government agencies. More information about CMD is available here. You can reach CMD's Executive Director, Arn Pearson, via editor AT ALECexposed.org. Privacy policy: Other than material you post to this wiki in your name, our privacy policy is that we will not disclose private personally identifiable information or data about you, such as your name, email address, or other information, unless required by law. On copyright: ALEC Exposed considers contributions to this wiki to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License or in accordance with law. Information on how to provide us with notice regarding copyright is available at this link. Notices regarding copyright or other matters should be sent to our designated agent, Arn Pearson, via email (editor AT ALECexposed.org).