Resolution to Endorse the Recommendations of the 2014 Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pension Plan Funding Exposed: Difference between revisions
m Changed SW URLs from HTTP to HTTPS |
updated bill text and bill info |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox ALEC Bills | |||
|bill_title = Resolution to Endorse the Recommendations of the 2014 Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pension Plan Funding | |||
|date_introduced = | |||
|date_reviewed = | |||
|date_finalized = 2015 Annual Meeting | |||
|date_amended = January 9, 2015 | |||
|date_accessed = May 3, 2018 | |||
|type = Model Policy | |||
|status = Final | |||
|task_forces = Tax and Fiscal Policy | |||
|keywords = Tax Reform, Pensions | |||
|notes = | |||
}} | |||
= | <h1>Resolution to Endorse the Recommendations of the 2014 Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pension Plan Funding</h1> | ||
WHEREAS, many states and local government entities are facing significant defined benefit (DB) pension unfunded liabilities. The cumulative deficits computed in today’s dollars are estimated to be between $1T to $3T with some estimates exceeding this range depending upon the precise actuarial methodology and assumptions utilized. | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Resolution to Endorse the Recommendations of the 2014 Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pension Plan Funding</strong></p> | ||
<p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, many states and local government entities are facing significant defined benefit (DB) pension unfunded liabilities. The cumulative deficits computed in today’s dollars are estimated to be between $1T to $3T with some estimates exceeding this range depending upon the precise actuarial methodology and assumptions utilized.</p> | |||
WHEREAS, such deficits are unsustainable and have led to repeated fiscal concerns expressed by actuaries, accountants and other financial professionals. These pension liabilities, together with other fiscal imbalances, have resulted in successive credit rating downgrades of state and local debt. | <p><strong>WHEREAS,</strong> such deficits are unsustainable and have led to repeated fiscal concerns expressed by actuaries, accountants and other financial professionals. These pension liabilities, together with other fiscal imbalances, have resulted in successive credit rating downgrades of state and local debt.</p> | ||
<p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, many DB plans are projected to become insolvent unless significant and comprehensive reforms are enacted to make these plans sustainable.</p> | |||
WHEREAS, many DB plans are projected to become insolvent unless significant and comprehensive reforms are enacted to make these plans sustainable. | <p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, plan design changes affecting both current and future members represent an essential component of the necessary comprehensive pension reforms.</p> | ||
<p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, to achieve long-term DB plans sustainability will require accompanying reforms consisting of adopting and consistently adhering to proper funding policies.</p> | |||
WHEREAS, plan design changes affecting both current and future members represent an essential component of the necessary comprehensive pension reforms. | <p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, to date the predominate focus of most pension reform efforts has emphasized plan design changes while frequently neglecting or deferring the necessary and appropriate reforms to existing funding policies.</p> | ||
<p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, chronic underfunding and the absence of sound funding policies will lead to more plan insolvencies even if plan design changes are successfully implemented.</p> | |||
WHEREAS, to achieve long-term DB plans sustainability will require accompanying reforms consisting of adopting and consistently adhering to proper funding policies. | <p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, there is a paucity of efforts addressing proper pension funding practices. What is needed is a template to develop proper funding reforms.</p> | ||
<p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, a basic funding tenet is that, in the aggregate, pension benefits should be funded over the same period that benefits are being earned.</p> | |||
WHEREAS, to date the predominate focus of most pension reform efforts has emphasized plan design changes while frequently neglecting or deferring the necessary and appropriate reforms to existing funding policies. | <p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, in the spirit of federalism, every state should determine a precise funding policy {and adhere to it} based upon sound financial funding principles.</p> | ||
<p><strong>NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED </strong>in support of achieving the necessary comprehensive and sustainable pension reforms, such long-overdue funding reforms must be adopted and consistently followed. To facilitate the development of this important goal, <strong>{insert state}</strong> supports the recommendations found in <strong>2014</strong> <strong>Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pension Plan Funding Report </strong>based upon the four basic funding principles of<strong> Adequacy</strong>, <strong>Intergenerational Equity</strong>, <strong>Cost Stability and Predictability. </strong>As such, <strong>{insert state} </strong>endorses this report as a starting point for the development of a precise set of funding assumptions and funding methods appropriate to the respective public entity.</p> | |||
WHEREAS, chronic underfunding and the absence of sound funding policies will lead to more plan insolvencies even if plan design changes are successfully implemented. | <p>Establishing and consistently adhering to a DB funding policy consistent with these principles has secondary benefit as being generally consistent with many of the tenets formulated by the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and certain credit rating agencies.</p> | ||
<p><strong>BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED</strong> that achieving this basic level and standard of pension funding should be achieved without the use of new debt.</p> | |||
WHEREAS, there is a paucity of efforts addressing proper pension funding practices. What is needed is a template to develop proper funding reforms. | <p style="text-align: center;"><em>Approved by the ALEC Board of Directors January 9, 2015.</em></p> | ||
WHEREAS, a basic funding tenet is that, in the aggregate, pension benefits should be funded over the same period that benefits are being earned. | |||
WHEREAS, in the spirit of federalism, every state should determine a precise funding policy {and adhere to it} based upon sound financial funding principles. | |||
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED in support of achieving the necessary comprehensive and sustainable pension reforms, such long-overdue funding reforms must be adopted and consistently followed. To facilitate the development of this important goal, {insert state} supports the recommendations found in 2014 Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pension Plan Funding Report based upon the four basic funding principles of Adequacy, Intergenerational Equity, Cost Stability and Predictability. As such, {insert state} endorses this report as a starting point for the development of a precise set of funding assumptions and funding methods appropriate to the respective public entity. | |||
Establishing and consistently adhering to a DB funding policy consistent with these principles has secondary benefit as being generally consistent with many of the tenets formulated by the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and certain credit rating agencies. | |||
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that achieving this basic level and standard of pension funding should be achieved without the use of new debt. |
Latest revision as of 17:30, 3 May 2018
Model Bill Info | |
---|---|
Bill Title | Resolution to Endorse the Recommendations of the 2014 Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pension Plan Funding |
Date Finalized | 2015 Annual Meeting |
Date Amended | January 9, 2015 |
Date Accessed | May 3, 2018 |
Type | Model Policy |
Status | Final |
Task Forces | Tax and Fiscal Policy |
Keywords | Tax Reform, Pensions |
Resolution to Endorse the Recommendations of the 2014 Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pension Plan Funding
Resolution to Endorse the Recommendations of the 2014 Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pension Plan Funding
WHEREAS, many states and local government entities are facing significant defined benefit (DB) pension unfunded liabilities. The cumulative deficits computed in today’s dollars are estimated to be between $1T to $3T with some estimates exceeding this range depending upon the precise actuarial methodology and assumptions utilized.
WHEREAS, such deficits are unsustainable and have led to repeated fiscal concerns expressed by actuaries, accountants and other financial professionals. These pension liabilities, together with other fiscal imbalances, have resulted in successive credit rating downgrades of state and local debt.
WHEREAS, many DB plans are projected to become insolvent unless significant and comprehensive reforms are enacted to make these plans sustainable.
WHEREAS, plan design changes affecting both current and future members represent an essential component of the necessary comprehensive pension reforms.
WHEREAS, to achieve long-term DB plans sustainability will require accompanying reforms consisting of adopting and consistently adhering to proper funding policies.
WHEREAS, to date the predominate focus of most pension reform efforts has emphasized plan design changes while frequently neglecting or deferring the necessary and appropriate reforms to existing funding policies.
WHEREAS, chronic underfunding and the absence of sound funding policies will lead to more plan insolvencies even if plan design changes are successfully implemented.
WHEREAS, there is a paucity of efforts addressing proper pension funding practices. What is needed is a template to develop proper funding reforms.
WHEREAS, a basic funding tenet is that, in the aggregate, pension benefits should be funded over the same period that benefits are being earned.
WHEREAS, in the spirit of federalism, every state should determine a precise funding policy {and adhere to it} based upon sound financial funding principles.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED in support of achieving the necessary comprehensive and sustainable pension reforms, such long-overdue funding reforms must be adopted and consistently followed. To facilitate the development of this important goal, {insert state} supports the recommendations found in 2014 Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pension Plan Funding Report based upon the four basic funding principles of Adequacy, Intergenerational Equity, Cost Stability and Predictability. As such, {insert state} endorses this report as a starting point for the development of a precise set of funding assumptions and funding methods appropriate to the respective public entity.
Establishing and consistently adhering to a DB funding policy consistent with these principles has secondary benefit as being generally consistent with many of the tenets formulated by the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and certain credit rating agencies.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that achieving this basic level and standard of pension funding should be achieved without the use of new debt.
Approved by the ALEC Board of Directors January 9, 2015.