Resolution to Treat 17-Year-Olds As Juveniles: Difference between revisions
Created page with "The '''Resolution to Treat 17-Year-Olds as Juveniles''' was adopted by ALEC's Criminal Justice Reform Task Force on Decmeber 3, 2015, approved by the Board of Directors Januar..." |
updated bill text and bill info |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox ALEC Bills | |||
|bill_title = Resolution to Treat 17-Year-Olds As Juveniles | |||
|date_introduced = December 3, 2015 | |||
|date_reviewed = | |||
|date_finalized = January 16, 2016 | |||
|date_amended = | |||
|date_accessed = April 27, 2018 | |||
|type = Model Resolution | |||
|status = Final | |||
|task_forces = Criminal Justice | |||
|keywords = Criminal Justice | |||
|notes = | |||
}} | |||
<h2><em>Summary</em></h2> | |||
<p>This Resolution recognizes that 17-year-olds, who typically are juniors and seniors in high school living with their parents, should be presumptively treated as juveniles in the justice system.</p> | |||
<h1>Resolution to Treat 17-Year-Olds As Juveniles</h1> | |||
<p><u></u><strong>Whereas</strong>, the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is committed to developing effective criminal justice policies that create safe communities for citizens as well as strong state budgets; and</p> | |||
<p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, in more than 80 percent of states 17-year-olds are presumptively processed in the juvenile justice system; and</p> | |||
<p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, 17-year-olds are typically juniors and seniors in high school living with their parents; and</p> | |||
Whereas, the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is committed to developing effective criminal justice policies that create safe communities for citizens as well as strong state budgets; and | <p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, state juvenile justice systems typically allow for most types of offenses to be eventually be sealed if the person subsequently is law-abiding while an adult criminal record presents a significant obstacle to an individual’s ability to obtain employment, housing, and education, particularly given the proliferation of mechanisms for performing far-reaching background checks; and</p> | ||
<p><strong>Whereas</strong>, research has found that 17-year-olds are less likely to recidivate when placed in the juvenile system, which generally provides smaller caseloads, greater access to rehabilitation, and closer collaboration with families and schools; and</p> | |||
WHEREAS, in more than 80 percent of states 17-year-olds are presumptively processed in the juvenile justice system; and | <p><strong>Whereas</strong>, 17-year-olds are far more likely to be physically and sexually abused if places in adult prisons; and</p> | ||
<p><strong>Whereas</strong>, only the juvenile system ensures that the parent or guardian is contacted upon arrest and given the right to participate in court proceedings; and</p> | |||
WHEREAS, 17-year-olds are typically juniors and seniors in high school living with their parents; and | <p><strong>Whereas</strong>, states that have recently raised the age such as Connecticut and Illinois to bring 17-year-olds in the juvenile system have experienced positive results; and</p> | ||
<p><strong>WHEREAS</strong>, states have procedures for trying youths as adults, which generally apply to the most serious crimes, and such provisions would similarly apply to 17 year-olds if they are presumptively treated as juveniles;</p> | |||
WHEREAS, state juvenile justice systems typically allow for most types of offenses to be eventually be sealed if the person subsequently is law-abiding while an adult criminal record presents a significant obstacle to an individual’s ability to obtain employment, housing, and education, particularly given the proliferation of mechanisms for performing far-reaching background checks; and | <p><strong>Therefore Be It Resolved</strong> that [insert state here] should join more than four-fifths of all states in presumptively treating 17-year-olds as juveniles by passing legislation to raise its age of juvenile jurisdiction.</p> | ||
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Approved by Task Force in December 2015</em></p> | |||
Whereas, research has found that 17-year-olds are less likely to recidivate when placed in the juvenile system, which generally provides smaller caseloads, greater access to rehabilitation, and closer collaboration with families and schools; and | |||
Whereas, 17-year-olds are far more likely to be physically and sexually abused if places in adult prisons; and | |||
Whereas, only the juvenile system ensures that the parent or guardian is contacted upon arrest and given the right to participate in court proceedings; and | |||
Whereas, states that have recently raised the age such as Connecticut and Illinois to bring 17-year-olds in the juvenile system have experienced positive results; and | |||
WHEREAS, states have procedures for trying youths as adults, which generally apply to the most serious crimes, and such provisions would similarly apply to 17 year-olds if they are presumptively treated as juveniles; | |||
Therefore Be It Resolved that [insert state here] should join more than four-fifths of all states in presumptively treating 17-year-olds as juveniles by passing legislation to raise its age of juvenile jurisdiction. | |||
Approved by Task Force in December 2015 | |||
Latest revision as of 19:03, 27 April 2018
| Model Bill Info | |
|---|---|
| Bill Title | Resolution to Treat 17-Year-Olds As Juveniles |
| Date Introduced | December 3, 2015 |
| Date Finalized | January 16, 2016 |
| Date Accessed | April 27, 2018 |
| Type | Model Resolution |
| Status | Final |
| Task Forces | Criminal Justice |
| Keywords | Criminal Justice |
Summary
This Resolution recognizes that 17-year-olds, who typically are juniors and seniors in high school living with their parents, should be presumptively treated as juveniles in the justice system.
Resolution to Treat 17-Year-Olds As Juveniles
Whereas, the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is committed to developing effective criminal justice policies that create safe communities for citizens as well as strong state budgets; and
WHEREAS, in more than 80 percent of states 17-year-olds are presumptively processed in the juvenile justice system; and
WHEREAS, 17-year-olds are typically juniors and seniors in high school living with their parents; and
WHEREAS, state juvenile justice systems typically allow for most types of offenses to be eventually be sealed if the person subsequently is law-abiding while an adult criminal record presents a significant obstacle to an individual’s ability to obtain employment, housing, and education, particularly given the proliferation of mechanisms for performing far-reaching background checks; and
Whereas, research has found that 17-year-olds are less likely to recidivate when placed in the juvenile system, which generally provides smaller caseloads, greater access to rehabilitation, and closer collaboration with families and schools; and
Whereas, 17-year-olds are far more likely to be physically and sexually abused if places in adult prisons; and
Whereas, only the juvenile system ensures that the parent or guardian is contacted upon arrest and given the right to participate in court proceedings; and
Whereas, states that have recently raised the age such as Connecticut and Illinois to bring 17-year-olds in the juvenile system have experienced positive results; and
WHEREAS, states have procedures for trying youths as adults, which generally apply to the most serious crimes, and such provisions would similarly apply to 17 year-olds if they are presumptively treated as juveniles;
Therefore Be It Resolved that [insert state here] should join more than four-fifths of all states in presumptively treating 17-year-olds as juveniles by passing legislation to raise its age of juvenile jurisdiction.
Approved by Task Force in December 2015