Democracy, Voter Rights, and Federal Power: Difference between revisions

From ALEC Exposed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m Changed PRW URLs from HTTP to HTTPS
 
(70 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--        DEMOCRACY, VOTER RIGHTS, AND FEDERAL POWER LAYOUT        -->
<!--        DEMOCRACY, VOTER RIGHTS, AND FEDERAL POWER LAYOUT        -->
{| style="width: 100%; margin:4px 0 0 0; border:1px solid #c9d7f0;"
<!--        INTRO PARAGRAPH        -->
<!--        INTRO PARAGRAPH        -->
| vertical-align:top; color:#000000;" |
<div class="mp-1col">
{| style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#7BA7E1;"
{| style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#BDD3F0;color:#ffffff;"
! style="padding:2px;" | <h2 style="margin:3px; background:#2966B8; font-size:140%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #2966B8; text-align:left; color:#FFFFFF; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">ALEC's Efforts to limit democratic participation, facilitate big money in politics, and allow states to override the federal government.</h2>
! style="padding:2px;" | <h2 style="margin:3px; background:#2966B8; font-size:140%; font-weight:bold; text-align:left; color:#FFFFFF; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Efforts to limit democratic participation, facilitate big money in politics, and override the federal government</h2>
|-
|-
| style="color:#000000;" | <div style="padding:2px 5px; font-size:120%;">[[File:vote.jpg|200px|left|alt=Democracy, Voter Rights, and Federal Power]]'''The bills on this page represent ALEC corporations' efforts to disenfranchise Americans, to thwart federal government mandates, and to change campaign finance laws and give corporations greater ability to spend money influencing politics.''' These "model bills" are drafted at American Legislative Exchange Council conventions with input from, and approval by, Big Business, then introduced in state legislatures to erode the democratic power of average Americans. '''Politicians are elected to represent the people, not corporations; through ALEC, corporations have both a VOICE and a VOTE on specific state laws. ''Do you?'' '''</div>
| style="color:#000000; font-size:120%; padding:0 0.75em;" |[[File:votesquare.png|100px|left|alt=Democracy, Voter Rights, and Federal Power]]'''This page shows how ALEC bills or resolutions would disenfranchise Americans and give corporations even more power to use their vast financial resources to influence elections in our democracy.''' These "model bills" include the infamous "Voter ID" bills pushed through this year by new governors, many of whom have ties to ALEC.
 
'''Through ALEC, corporations have both a VOICE and a VOTE on specific state laws affecting your voting rights and elections through these model bills. ''Do you?'' '''
|}
|}
</div>
<!--        QUICK REFERENCE        -->
<!--        QUICK FACTS        -->
<div class="mp-1col">
{| style="width:100%; text-align:left; background:#ffffff;"
|-
| style="color:#000000; font-size:100%; padding:0 0.75em;" |
[[Image:Bills.jpg|left|50px]]
<big>[[Bills Affecting Civil Rights and Our Democracy|You can access these ALEC "model" on democracy, voter rights, and federal power here]].
----
[[Image:Fact Sheet.jpg|left|100px]]
[[Media:ALEC_on_Democracy.pdf|Download a one-page fact sheet on ALEC and democracy here]].
----
[[Image:Take_Action!.png|left|115px|link=http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/632/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=10002]]
[http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/632/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=10002  Send a letter to ALEC companies asking them to cut ties with  ALEC.]</big>
|}
|}
</div>


<!--        MAIN CONTENT        -->
<!--        MAIN CONTENT        -->
{| style="width: 100%; margin:4px 0 0 0; background:none; border-spacing: 0px;"
<!--        WHAT THE BILLS DO       -->
 
<div class="mp-2col-left">
<!--        FEATURED WORK       -->
{| style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF;"
| style="width:50%; border:1px solid #c9d7f0; background:#ffffff; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;" |
! style="padding:2px;" | <h2 style="margin:3px; background:#000000; font-size:140%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#ffffff; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">How do these bills limit democratic participation?</h2>
{| style="vertical-align:top; background:#ffffff;"
! style="padding:2px;" | <h2 style="margin:3px; background:#CC0000; font-size:140%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CC0000; text-align:left; color:#ffffff; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">READ the "Model Bills" HERE</h2>
|-
|-
| style="color:#000000;" | <div style="padding:2px 5px;">[[Image:Point.png|left|70px]][[media:7G0-9.zip|<big>Click here for a zip file of ''all'' bills relating to '''democracy, voter rights, and federal power.<'''/big>]]
| style="color:#000000; padding:0 0.75em;" |[[Image:wethecorporations.png|left|140px]]
<big>'''These bills limit the democratic influence of average Americans in favor of corporations by:'''</big><br>
* [[Media:7G16-VOTER_ID_ACT_Exposed.pdf|Disenfranchising disabled, low-income, elderly, people-of-color, and student voters]] who move more frequently or do not drive, by requiring all voters show a state ID at the polls -- even though counties have traditionally accepted other proofs of residence without any significant problems.
* [[Media:7G9-Resolution_Opposing_Taxpayer_Financed_Political_Campaigns_Exposed.pdf|Opposing public financing of elections]] designed to reduce the influence of moneyed interests, and justifying their position with the plainly untrue assertion that "campaign contributions have no effect upon legislative behavior."
* [[Media:7G4-Resolution_in_Support_of_the_Citizens_United_Decision_Exposed.pdf|Anticipating unlimited secret spending in the 2010 midterm elections]] and releasing a resolution opposing the disclosure of donors, before many others recognized how corporations, CEOs, and corporate front groups would hide behind non-disclosure rules and funnel hundreds of millions of dollars into the 2010 elections, with more to come in 2012.
* [[Media:7G2-Model_Resolution_Restricting_the_Use_of_Random_Sampling_Exposed.pdf|Opposing the use of statistical sampling]] to get an accurate count of urban people of color and immigrants in the U.S. Census, although many modern countries use such cost-effective and accurate tools to conduct their census. Some politicians have expressed concern that this would increase the number of electoral votes and districts to favor Democrats.
* [[Media:7G11-RESOLUTION_SUPPORTING_THE_FIRST_AMENDMENT_IN_ELECTIONS_Exposed.pdf|Opposing "false statement" laws passed by states]] designed to ensure that campaign ads do not mislead voters with false statements.
<br>
<br>
<big>To see a full list of bills from this section and send them to your computer individually, [[Bills Affecting Civil Rights and Our Democracy|click here]].</big>'''
''To see a full list of these bills, [[Bills Affecting Civil Rights and Our Democracy|click here]]''
----
|}
<big>''For descriptions of some of these bills, [[#How are ALEC corporations limiting democratic participation?| scroll down or click here]]''.</big></div>


<!--       TWITTER WIDGET        -->
<!-- VIDEO -->
{| style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF;"
! style="padding:2px;" | <h2 style="margin:3px; background:#000000; font-size:140%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#ffffff; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">John Nichols on ALEC & Democracy</h2>
|-
|-
! style="padding:2px;" | <h2 style="margin:3px; background:#000000; font-size:140%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#ffffff; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Join the Conversation</h2>
| style="text-align:center;" |{{#widget:YouTube|id=nAE_ceycCAA|width=230|height=202}}
|-
|-
| style="color:#000000; padding:2px 5px 5px;" | <center>
| style="color:#000000; padding:0 0.75em;" |Watch [[John Nichols Discusses ALEC|John Nichols]], writer for ''The Nation'' magazine, discuss ALEC and the corporate efforts to undermine democracy.
{{#widget:Twitter
 
|user=prwatch
Watch other ALEC Exposed experts [[ALEC Exposed Audio & Video|here]].<br>
|count=3
Read John Nichols' article in ''The Nation'' [http://www.thenation.com/article/161969/rigging-elections here].
|shell.background=#030303
|tweets.background=#ffffff
|shell.color=#ffffff
|tweets.color=#030303
|tweets.links=#CC0000
}}</center>
|}
|}
| style="border:1px solid transparent;" |


<!--       HOW YOU CAN HELP        -->
<!--     READ THE MODEL BILLS      -->
| style="width:50%; border:1px solid #c9d7f0; background:#ffffff; vertical-align:top;"|
{| style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF;"
{{How you can expose ALEC}}
! style="padding:2px;" | <h2 style="margin:3px; background:#000000; font-size:140%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#ffffff; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">READ the "Model Bills"  HERE</h2>
|-
| style="color:#000000; padding:0 0.75em;" |[[Image:Point.png|left|70px]][[media:Democracy,_Voter_Rights_and_Federal_Power.zip|<big>Click  here for a zip file of '''Democracy, Voter Rights and Federal Power'''  bills</big>]]
 
Looking for the resolution voted on  by ALEC politicians and corporations in favor of the Supreme Court's  decision in the "Citizens United" case?  It's  [[Media:7G4-Resolution_in_Support_of_the_Citizens_United_Decision_Exposed.pdf|here]].
<br>
[[Image:Full list.png|left|70px]]
<big>For  a full list of individual bills from this section, [[Bills Affecting  Civil Rights and Our Democracy|click here]]</big>
<br>
<br>
----
 
<big>''For  descriptions of some of these bills, [[#How are ALEC corporations limiting democratic participation?|scroll down or click here]].''</big><br/>
|}
|}
</div>


<!--        THREE COLUMN TABLE       -->
<!--        DID YOU KNOW ABOUT THESE BILLS       -->
{| style="width: 100%; margin:4px 0 0 0; border:1px solid #c9d7f0;"
<div class="mp-2col-right">
| style="width:25%; border:1px solid #c9d7f0; background:#ffffff; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;" |
{| style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff;"
{{Get the Goods}}
! style="padding:2px;" | <h2 style="margin:3px; background:#000000; font-size:140%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#ffffff; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">ALEC Inspired Voter Suppression Measures Take Off</h2>
| style="border:1px solid transparent;" |
|-
| style="color:#000000; padding:0 0.75em;" |After Barack Obama swept into office in November of 2008 with the  energized support of youth and African Americans, suddenly "voter fraud"  became a deep concern for many in the Republican party -- despite no  evidence fraud occurred in any statistically significant way. When  Republicans emerged from the November 2010 elections with new majorities  in statehouses across the country, a total of [  [http://www.brennancenter.org/content/section/category/voter_id  37  states] saw strict voter ID laws introduced in 2011 and 2012. Many of  those proposals contained elements of the ALEC "model" voter ID act,  which imposes new burdens on the right to vote by requiring voters show  state-issued ID cards that  [http://www.brennancenter.org/content/section/category/voter_id  approximately 11 percent] of voting-age American citizens do not  possess. That number is even higher for students, African Americans,  low-income, and older citizens. Though the ALEC "model" provides for  free ID cards, the Brennan Center for Justice  [http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/the_challenge_of_obtaining_voter_identification/  has found] that the process of obtaining an ID presents significant  difficulties, with voters lacking access to transportation, living  dozens of miles from the nearest ID-issuing office (many of which have  irregular and limited hours), and facing costs and headaches in  obtaining supporting documentation like birth certificates.  Additionally, the in-person voter fraud these laws might prevent happens  at an infinitesimally small rate -- meaning that on balance, the  purported benefits of the law (stopping voter fraud) do not outweigh the  costs of disenfranchising as many as 21 million American citizens.


| style="width:25%; border:1px solid #c9d7f0; background:#ffffff; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;" |
Photo  voter ID bills were signed into law in eight states — Alabama, Kansas,  Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin, and  Pennsylvania — and passed by referendum in Mississippi. Additionally,  Minnesota's legislature approved a ballot measure to amend the state  constitution to require ID at the polls.
{{Behind ALEC}}
| style="border:1px solid transparent;" |


| style="width:50%; border:1px solid #c9d7f0; background:#ffffff; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;" |
Though the  number of states with strict voter ID laws  [http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/2012_summary_of_voting_law_changes/  quadrupled in 2011], there has been some pushback. Under Section 5 of  the 1965 Voting Rights Act, several states with a history of racially  motivated voting rights discrimination require federal pre-approval for  changes to voting procedures and practices, and the U.S. Department of  Justice has refused to approve voter ID laws passed by South Carolina  and Texas. In Wisconsin,  [https://www.prwatch.org/news/2012/07/11649/second-judge-finds-wis-voter-id-law-unconstitutional  two state judges] have found the law violates the state constitution's  express protections for voting rights. A Pennsylvania court upheld that  state's law but it is being appealed to the state's supreme court. Other  challenges to the laws are pending.
----
'''This information is available for download as a one-page fact sheet [[Media:ALEC_on_Democracy.pdf|here]].'''
----
|}
 
<!--    HELPFUL RESOURCES      -->
{{Helpful Resources}}
{{Helpful Resources}}
|}
</div>


<!--        LEARN MORE        -->
<!--        LEARN MORE        -->
{| style="width: 100%; margin:4px 0 0 0; border:1px solid #c9d7f0;"
<div class="mp-1col">
| vertical-align:top; color:#000000;" |
{{Learn More}}
{{Learn More}}
|}
</div>


<!--        ADDITIONAL CONTENT       -->
<!--        THREE COLUMN TABLE       -->
{| style="width: 100%; margin:4px 0 0 0; background:none; border-spacing: 0px;"
<div class="mp-3col-left">
{{Behind ALEC 3}}
</div>


<!--        WHAT THE BILLS DO        -->
<div class="mp-3col-center">
| style="width:55%; border:1px solid #c9d7f0; background:#ffffff; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;" |
{{Topics 2}}
{| style="vertical-align:top; background:#ffffff;"
</div>
! style="padding:2px;" | <h2 style="margin:3px; background:#000000; font-size:140%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#ffffff; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">How are ALEC corporations limiting democratic participation?</h2>
|-
| style="color:#000000;" | <div style="padding:2px 5px;">[[Image:Scales.png|left|140px]]
<big>'''These bills limit the democratic influence of average Americans in favor of corporations by:</big><br>
* '''Disenfranchising low-income, elderly, people-of-color, and student voters''' by requiring all voters show a state ID at the polls (7G16)
* '''Opposing public financing of elections designed to reduce the influence of moneyed interests''', justifying their position with the dubious assertion that “campaign contributions have no effect upon legislative behavior” (7G9)
* '''Anticipating unlimited secret spending in the 2010 midterm elections''', releasing a Resolution supporting non-disclosure before anyone recognized how right-wing groups would secretly spend hundreds of millions in the 2010 elections (7G4)
* '''Opposing the use of statistical sampling to get an accurate count of urban people of color and immigrants in the U.S. Census''', out of concern that it would increase power for Democrats (7G2)
* '''Opposing “false statement” laws passed by states''' designed to ensure that campaign ads don’t mislead voters with false statements (7G11)</div>
|}
| style="border:1px solid transparent;" |
 
<!--        DID YOU KNOW ABOUT THESE BILLS        -->
| style="width:45%; border:1px solid #c9d7f0; background:#ffffff; vertical-align:top;"|
{| style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff;"
! style="padding:2px;" | <h2 style="margin:3px; background:#000000; font-size:140%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#ffffff; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Did You Know about ''these'' Bills?</h2>
|-
| style="color:#000000;" | <div style="padding:2px 5px;"><h3>Some of this Corporate Agenda Has Already Become Law</h3>
[[Image:Wisconsin.png|left|90px]](PLACEHOLDER)'''Taking a page from the ALEC corporation playbook, in May, 2011 Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an ALEC alum, signed into law one of the most restrictive "Voter ID" restrictions in the country.''' Many in the state do not have driver's licenses -- around half of the state's African-American and Latino populations and 178,000 seniors -- and Department of Motor Vehicles offices are open erratically. Also under the bill, a current address is required on the license to vote, disenfranchising many students who move regularly. '''Wisconsin's Voter ID bill goes even further than the ALEC version.'''  To learn more about this story, click here (PLACEHOLDER)  (Have any of these bills been introduced or enacted in YOUR state?  If so, please add that information to the ALEC Exposed page on your state by searching for your state's name in the search engine at the top of this page.)


<h3>Limiting Damages for the Loss of Your Child, Spouse, or Parent</h3>
<div class="mp-3col-right">
[[Image:Family.png|left|90px]](PLACEHOLDER)One of the corporate-politician proposals of ALEC would limit the ability of a family to recover for emotional damages due to the death or injury of a loved one.  (LINK)  This type of legislation basically makes working class or poor people's lives--as well as the elderly--worth less to their families because any damages for pain and suffering due to the death of a child, spouse, or parent would be limited to an amount equal to their loved one's lost earnings and medical expenses. These kind of corporate provisions try to prevent a jury of YOUR peers from awarding you damages for all you have lost or suffered AFTER a jury finds that your loved one's death was the result of corporate negligence, misconduct, or greed. '''Is a local legislator who was elected to represent YOU actually protecting the profits of global corporate wrongdoers through such legislation instead of YOU and YOUR FAMILY?'''
{| style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff;"
 
! style="width:33%; padding:2px; vertical-align:top;" | <h2 style="margin:3px; background:#000000; font-size:140%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#ffffff; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Join the Conversation!</h2>
<h3>Barring Corporate Liability for Killing Your Dog or Cat</h3>
{{#widget:Twitter|user=alecexposed|id=364770906331033603}}
[[Image:Pet.png|left|90px]](PLACEHOLDER)In addition to limiting the rights of people injured by corporations, under the guise of limiting "frivolous" litigation in 2006, one of the proposals would make it harder for you to obtain any compensation from a company whose negligence killed your family pet.(LINK)  In 2009, Americans learned that many U.S. pet food companies had shipped the production of food for their four-legged companions overseas and that Chinese contractors had contaminated the pet food with melamine in order to increase profit margins, resulting in the death and serious injuries of numerous dogs and cats in the U.S.  '''If passed in your state, ALEC's corporation-backed proposal would make it very difficult for YOU to recover any damages for the loss of your beloved animal companion due to corporate negligence or misconduct in manufacturing food for America's beloved pets.'''</div>
|}
|}
|}
</div>


<!--        CONTACT INFO        -->
<!--        CONTACT INFO        -->
{| style="width: 100%; margin:4px 0 0 0; border:1px solid #c9d7f0;"
<div class="mp-1col-cmd">
| vertical-align:top; color:#000000;" |
{{CMD Project}}
{{CMD Project}}
|}
</div>
{{browsebar}}
{{browsebar}}
__NOTOC__  __NOEDITSECTION__
__NOTOC__  __NOEDITSECTION__

Latest revision as of 17:28, 13 October 2017

Efforts to limit democratic participation, facilitate big money in politics, and override the federal government

Democracy, Voter Rights, and Federal Power
This page shows how ALEC bills or resolutions would disenfranchise Americans and give corporations even more power to use their vast financial resources to influence elections in our democracy. These "model bills" include the infamous "Voter ID" bills pushed through this year by new governors, many of whom have ties to ALEC.

Through ALEC, corporations have both a VOICE and a VOTE on specific state laws affecting your voting rights and elections through these model bills. Do you?

How do these bills limit democratic participation?

These bills limit the democratic influence of average Americans in favor of corporations by:


To see a full list of these bills, click here

John Nichols on ALEC & Democracy

Watch John Nichols, writer for The Nation magazine, discuss ALEC and the corporate efforts to undermine democracy.

Watch other ALEC Exposed experts here.
Read John Nichols' article in The Nation here.

READ the "Model Bills" HERE

Click here for a zip file of Democracy, Voter Rights and Federal Power bills

Looking for the resolution voted on by ALEC politicians and corporations in favor of the Supreme Court's decision in the "Citizens United" case? It's here.

For a full list of individual bills from this section, click here


For descriptions of some of these bills, scroll down or click here.

ALEC Inspired Voter Suppression Measures Take Off

After Barack Obama swept into office in November of 2008 with the energized support of youth and African Americans, suddenly "voter fraud" became a deep concern for many in the Republican party -- despite no evidence fraud occurred in any statistically significant way. When Republicans emerged from the November 2010 elections with new majorities in statehouses across the country, a total of [ 37 states saw strict voter ID laws introduced in 2011 and 2012. Many of those proposals contained elements of the ALEC "model" voter ID act, which imposes new burdens on the right to vote by requiring voters show state-issued ID cards that approximately 11 percent of voting-age American citizens do not possess. That number is even higher for students, African Americans, low-income, and older citizens. Though the ALEC "model" provides for free ID cards, the Brennan Center for Justice has found that the process of obtaining an ID presents significant difficulties, with voters lacking access to transportation, living dozens of miles from the nearest ID-issuing office (many of which have irregular and limited hours), and facing costs and headaches in obtaining supporting documentation like birth certificates. Additionally, the in-person voter fraud these laws might prevent happens at an infinitesimally small rate -- meaning that on balance, the purported benefits of the law (stopping voter fraud) do not outweigh the costs of disenfranchising as many as 21 million American citizens.

Photo voter ID bills were signed into law in eight states — Alabama, Kansas, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania — and passed by referendum in Mississippi. Additionally, Minnesota's legislature approved a ballot measure to amend the state constitution to require ID at the polls.

Though the number of states with strict voter ID laws quadrupled in 2011, there has been some pushback. Under Section 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, several states with a history of racially motivated voting rights discrimination require federal pre-approval for changes to voting procedures and practices, and the U.S. Department of Justice has refused to approve voter ID laws passed by South Carolina and Texas. In Wisconsin, two state judges have found the law violates the state constitution's express protections for voting rights. A Pennsylvania court upheld that state's law but it is being appealed to the state's supreme court. Other challenges to the laws are pending.


This information is available for download as a one-page fact sheet here.



More Helpful Resources

Additional resources on ALEC's corporate agenda:

Learn MORE about the "Model Bills" ALEC Corporations Are Backing to Rewrite YOUR Rights

The Center for Media and Democracy analyzed the bills ALEC politicians and corporations voted for. More analysis is available below and also at ALEC Exposed's sister sites, PRWatch and SourceWatch.

Join the Conversation!

ALEC Exposed is a project of the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD). CMD does NOT accept donations from for-profit corporations or government agencies. More information about CMD is available here. You can reach CMD's Executive Director, Arn Pearson, via editor AT ALECexposed.org. Privacy policy: Other than material you post to this wiki in your name, our privacy policy is that we will not disclose private personally identifiable information or data about you, such as your name, email address, or other information, unless required by law. On copyright: ALEC Exposed considers contributions to this wiki to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License or in accordance with law. Information on how to provide us with notice regarding copyright is available at this link. Notices regarding copyright or other matters should be sent to our designated agent, Arn Pearson, via email (editor AT ALECexposed.org).