The Use Tax Elimination Act Exposed: Difference between revisions

From ALEC Exposed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
m Changed SW URLs from HTTP to HTTPS
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''[http://www.alecexposed.org/w/images/7/7c/8E9-The_Use_Tax_Elimination_Act_Exposed.pdf Use Tax Elimination Act]''' was adopted by ALEC's [http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/ALEC_Tax_and_Fiscal_Policy_Task_Force Tax and Fiscal Policy Task Force] at the Annual Meeting on August 9, 2002, and approved by the full ALEC Board of Directors in Spetember, 2002. According to ALEC's website, the Act was reapproved by the Board of Directors on January 29, 2013. (Accessed on 7/9/2015).
The '''[[:media:8E9-The_Use_Tax_Elimination_Act_Exposed.pdf|Use Tax Elimination Act]]''' was adopted by ALEC's [https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/ALEC_Tax_and_Fiscal_Policy_Task_Force Tax and Fiscal Policy Task Force] at the Annual Meeting on August 9, 2002, approved by the full ALEC Board of Directors in September, 2002. According to ALEC's website, the Act was re-approved by the Board of Directors on January 29, 2013. (Accessed on 7/9/2015).


==CMD's Bill Summary==
==CMD's Bill Summary==


This Act and those in this multi-state tax category help write rules that make combined reporting harder and make it harder to collect taxes from corporations in general. Like the[http://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/A_Resolution_In_Opposition_To_Mandatory_Unitary_Combined_Reporting_Exposed "Resolution in Opposition to Mandatory Unitary Combined Reporting,"] if enacted, the measure would allow a corporation to dodge their tax obligation with one state by reporting it as income in another state.  
This Act and those in this multi-state tax category help write rules that make combined reporting harder and make it harder to collect taxes from corporations in general. Like the [[A Resolution In Opposition To Mandatory Unitary Combined Reporting Exposed | Resolution in Opposition to Mandatory Unitary Combined Reporting,]] if enacted, the measure would allow a corporation to dodge their tax obligation with one state by reporting it as income in another state.  


==ALEC Bill Text==
==ALEC Bill Text==
Line 10: Line 10:


The use tax was created as a “counter-part” to the sales tax, and designed to capture tax revenue from sales made outside the state. As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Quill, the use tax is unenforceable since out-of-state sellers cannot be forced to collect that tax from in-state buyers. Even when use tax collection lines are placed on individual income tax returns, collections are paltry. The use tax has thus created a “nation of tax cheats.” In the name of simplicity and fairness, the use tax should be abolished.
The use tax was created as a “counter-part” to the sales tax, and designed to capture tax revenue from sales made outside the state. As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Quill, the use tax is unenforceable since out-of-state sellers cannot be forced to collect that tax from in-state buyers. Even when use tax collection lines are placed on individual income tax returns, collections are paltry. The use tax has thus created a “nation of tax cheats.” In the name of simplicity and fairness, the use tax should be abolished.


Model Legislation
Model Legislation
Line 15: Line 16:
{Title, enacting clause, etc.}
{Title, enacting clause, etc.}


Section 1. {Title} This Act may be cited as The Use Tax Elimination Act.
<u>Section 1. {Title}</u>
 
This Act may be cited as The Use Tax Elimination Act.
 
<u>Section 2. {Statement of Purpose}</u>
 
It is the intent of the LEGISLATIVE BODY to eliminate use taxation in the state of (Insert State Name).
 
<u>Section 3. {Amendment to State Sales and Use Tax Code}</u>


Section 2. {Statement of Purpose} It is the intent of the LEGISLATIVE BODY to eliminate use taxation in the state of (Insert State Name).
§§ [Insert Use Tax Sections from State Code] of the State Code are hereby repealed.


Section 3. {Amendment to State Sales and Use Tax Code} §§ [Insert Use Tax Sections from State Code] of the State Code are hereby repealed.
<u>Section 5. {Severability Clause}</u>


Section 5. {Severability Clause}
<u>Section 6. {Repealer Clause}</u>


Section 6. {Repealer Clause}
<u>Section 7. {Effective Date}</u>


Section 7. {Effective Date}


Adopted by the Tax and Fiscal Policy Task Force at the Annual Meeting, August 9, 2002.  
Adopted by the Tax and Fiscal Policy Task Force at the Annual Meeting, August 9, 2002.  


Approved by the full ALEC Board of Directors September, 2002.
Approved by the full ALEC Board of Directors September, 2002.

Latest revision as of 21:59, 12 October 2017

The Use Tax Elimination Act was adopted by ALEC's Tax and Fiscal Policy Task Force at the Annual Meeting on August 9, 2002, approved by the full ALEC Board of Directors in September, 2002. According to ALEC's website, the Act was re-approved by the Board of Directors on January 29, 2013. (Accessed on 7/9/2015).

CMD's Bill Summary

This Act and those in this multi-state tax category help write rules that make combined reporting harder and make it harder to collect taxes from corporations in general. Like the Resolution in Opposition to Mandatory Unitary Combined Reporting, if enacted, the measure would allow a corporation to dodge their tax obligation with one state by reporting it as income in another state.

ALEC Bill Text

Summary

The use tax was created as a “counter-part” to the sales tax, and designed to capture tax revenue from sales made outside the state. As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Quill, the use tax is unenforceable since out-of-state sellers cannot be forced to collect that tax from in-state buyers. Even when use tax collection lines are placed on individual income tax returns, collections are paltry. The use tax has thus created a “nation of tax cheats.” In the name of simplicity and fairness, the use tax should be abolished.


Model Legislation

{Title, enacting clause, etc.}

Section 1. {Title}

This Act may be cited as The Use Tax Elimination Act.

Section 2. {Statement of Purpose}

It is the intent of the LEGISLATIVE BODY to eliminate use taxation in the state of (Insert State Name).

Section 3. {Amendment to State Sales and Use Tax Code}

§§ [Insert Use Tax Sections from State Code] of the State Code are hereby repealed.

Section 5. {Severability Clause}

Section 6. {Repealer Clause}

Section 7. {Effective Date}


Adopted by the Tax and Fiscal Policy Task Force at the Annual Meeting, August 9, 2002.

Approved by the full ALEC Board of Directors September, 2002.