Resolution to Repeal Section 526 Exposed: Difference between revisions

From ALEC Exposed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Added CMD summary (EV)
m Changed SW URLs from HTTP to HTTPS
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''[http://www.alecexposed.org/w/images/f/f7/3E10-Resolution_to_Repeal_Section_526_Exposed.pdf Resolution to Repeal Section 526]''' was adopted by ALEC's [http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/ALEC_Energy,_Environment_and_Agriculture_Task_Force Energy, Environment, and Agriculture Task Force.] According to ALEC.org, the Resolution was approved by the Board of Directors in 2009, reapproved on January 9, 2015. (Accessed on 7/29/2015).
The '''[[:media:3E10-Resolution_to_Repeal_Section_526_Exposed.pdf|Resolution to Repeal Section 526]]''' was adopted by ALEC's [https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/ALEC_Energy,_Environment_and_Agriculture_Task_Force Energy, Environment, and Agriculture Task Force.] According to ALEC.org, the Resolution was approved by the Board of Directors in 2009, re-approved on January 9, 2015. (Accessed on 7/29/2015).
 
==CMD's Bill Summary==
==CMD's Bill Summary==


[http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Greenhouse_Gas_Limits_in_2007_Energy_Act Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act] prohibits federal agencies from using "dirty fuel" that produces more greenhouse gases than conventional fuel, such as fuel obtained from the [http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Alberta's_tar_sands Alberta tar sands], which is causing devastating consequences to that region.
[https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Greenhouse_Gas_Limits_in_2007_Energy_Act Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act] prohibits federal agencies from using "dirty fuel" that produces more greenhouse gases than conventional fuel, such as fuel obtained from the [https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Alberta's_tar_sands Alberta tar sands], which is causing devastating consequences to that region.


==ALEC Bill Text==
==ALEC Resolution Text==


WHEREAS, Section 526 attempts to prohibit agencies of the government of the United States from purchasing transportation fuels that are derived from alternative or synthetic fuels, including fuels produced from nonconventional petroleum sources; and
WHEREAS, Section 526 attempts to prohibit agencies of the government of the United States from purchasing transportation fuels that are derived from alternative or synthetic fuels, including fuels produced from non-conventional petroleum sources; and


WHEREAS, the U.S. military and federal government agencies would face an immense challenge in addressing Section 526, due to the total impracticality and lack of means for determining the original sources of the fuels they purchase; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. military and federal government agencies would face an immense challenge in addressing Section 526, due to the total impracticality and lack of means for determining the original sources of the fuels they purchase; and
Line 16: Line 17:
WHEREAS, fuels derived from coal-to-liquids, oil shale and oil sands are all potentially abundant in the United States and Canada; and
WHEREAS, fuels derived from coal-to-liquids, oil shale and oil sands are all potentially abundant in the United States and Canada; and


WHEREAS, the U.S. military, ''(now engaged in two wars,)'' is the largest single purchaser of transportation fuels in the country; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. military, <strike>now engaged in two wars,</strike> is the largest single purchaser of transportation fuels in the country; and


WHEREAS, American jobs and economic growth are tied directly to past, current and future investment in the development of new sources of domestic and North American energy, including oil sands and coal-to-liquid technologies; and
WHEREAS, American jobs and economic growth are tied directly to past, current and future investment in the development of new sources of domestic and North American energy, including oil sands and coal-to-liquid technologies; and

Latest revision as of 21:29, 12 October 2017

The Resolution to Repeal Section 526 was adopted by ALEC's Energy, Environment, and Agriculture Task Force. According to ALEC.org, the Resolution was approved by the Board of Directors in 2009, re-approved on January 9, 2015. (Accessed on 7/29/2015).

CMD's Bill Summary

Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act prohibits federal agencies from using "dirty fuel" that produces more greenhouse gases than conventional fuel, such as fuel obtained from the Alberta tar sands, which is causing devastating consequences to that region.

ALEC Resolution Text

WHEREAS, Section 526 attempts to prohibit agencies of the government of the United States from purchasing transportation fuels that are derived from alternative or synthetic fuels, including fuels produced from non-conventional petroleum sources; and

WHEREAS, the U.S. military and federal government agencies would face an immense challenge in addressing Section 526, due to the total impracticality and lack of means for determining the original sources of the fuels they purchase; and

WHEREAS, such a prohibition would decrease supply of fuels from domestic and North American sources; and

WHEREAS, energy demand is increasing and America’s energy security depends on access to reliable, safe and trusted supply sources; and

WHEREAS, fuels derived from coal-to-liquids, oil shale and oil sands are all potentially abundant in the United States and Canada; and

WHEREAS, the U.S. military, now engaged in two wars, is the largest single purchaser of transportation fuels in the country; and

WHEREAS, American jobs and economic growth are tied directly to past, current and future investment in the development of new sources of domestic and North American energy, including oil sands and coal-to-liquid technologies; and

WHEREAS, Section 526 contradicts and conflicts with Section 369 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, a more comprehensive law which directs the U.S. Department of Defense to support an energy development program with Canada; and

WHEREAS, Canada is by far the largest foreign supplier of energy to the United States; and

WHEREAS, the North American Free Trade Act prohibits discrimination against the products of Canada by the United States.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the American Legislative Exchange Council, that Section 526 of the “Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007” should be repealed.