Environment: Difference between revisions
edit top box language |
add summaries |
||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
-------------------------What the Bills Do------------------------> | -------------------------What the Bills Do------------------------> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#000; font-size:160%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000; text-align:left; color:#FFF; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> | ! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#000; font-size:160%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000; text-align:left; color:#FFF; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">How are corporations undermining environmental conservation in these bills?</h2> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="color:#000;"| | |style="color:#000;"| | ||
[[Image:Scales.png|left|140px]] | [[Image:Scales.png|left|140px]] | ||
<big>''' | <big>'''Energy companies, corporate polluters, Big Agriculture and their politician allies VOTED to change environmental rules by:</big><br> | ||
( | * '''Eliminating land use and zoning regulations''' designed to guide new development according to community goals while protecting community resources, replacing it with agreements between private actors. (3H4, also 3H1) | ||
''' | * '''Undermining environmental regulations''' by allowing landowners to sue the government for alleged “regulatory takings,” through the innocuously named: | ||
''' | ** '''“Private Property Protection Act”''' (3G9) | ||
''' | ** '''“Regulatory Costs Fairness Act”''' (3G5) | ||
''' | * '''Giving states authority to appropriate national parks and other federal public land,''' possibly to allow greater oil, gas, and coal exploration, applying a very conservative interpretation of Congress’ Constitutional powers. (3G0) | ||
''' | * '''Reversing notions of preemption''' through: | ||
''' | ** '''allowing local governments to establish regulatory “ceilings”''' and demand that more stringent state or federal regulations be watered-down (3H15), or | ||
''' | ** '''giving states authority to invalidate any federal law or directive''' by applying a narrow interpretation of Congress’ powers, and an expansive understanding of state’s rights (3H14) | ||
''' | * '''Creating new burdens in passing environmental regulations''' through: | ||
** '''Establishing a business-dominated panel to “assess” all environmental regulations''', using a framework established by a climate change-denier, the “Copenhagen Consensus” (3H2) | |||
** '''Requiring states pass through multiple layers of process before passing environmental regulations''', including approval by two five-person panels predicting the “economic” and “environmental” impacts (3C2) | |||
* '''Opposing uniform rules on hazardous coal combustion waste''', in favor of a race-to-the-bottom amongst state rules. (3J1) | |||
* '''Opposing local, state, and federal waste reduction and mandated recycling laws,''' including regulations on packaging (such as Styrofoam restrictions) in favor of a “voluntary” approach to waste reduction. (3J0) | |||
* '''Permitting dangerous “fracking” exploration for natural gas''', a process that has contaminated groundwater across the country (as portrayed in the Oscar-nominated film Gasland), under the guise of “state’s rights” (3E11) | |||
* '''Protecting polluting corporations from civil and criminal liability''' by making a company’s environmental audit reports “privileged” and inadmissible in legal proceedings (3H18) (3H1) | |||
* '''Privatizing public water and sewer systems''', a practice that has resulted in higher rates and negative environmental impacts, and prohibiting local governments from requiring contractors meet labor and wage standards. (3H3) | |||
* '''Streamlining siting for nuclear and other power plants''' by placing siting authority in a central agency (3E4) | |||
* '''Hindering state-level regulation of groundwater contaminants''' by establishing EPA standards as a ceiling (rather than a floor), giving Department of Agriculture regulatory (and regulatory veto) authority, and adding other burdens. (3K0) | |||
* '''Prohibiting local efforts to oppose bio-engineered and GMO crops''' in favor of centralized state regulation (3A3) | |||
* '''Protecting factory farms from nuisance liability''' by giving state agencies authority to define “accepted practices” and deterring individuals from filing complaints. (3A8) | |||
* '''Forbidding local governments from limiting pesticide use''' in favor of centralized state regulation (3A9). | |||
<!-- | <!-- |
Revision as of 18:35, 16 June 2011
|
|
|
|