|
|
| Line 131: |
Line 131: |
| (PLACEHOLDER)'''Making it easier for corporations''' to get a judge to dismiss an injured American's case before it gets to a jury;<br> | | (PLACEHOLDER)'''Making it easier for corporations''' to get a judge to dismiss an injured American's case before it gets to a jury;<br> |
| '''Making it harder for injured people''' to use "class action" procedures which strengthen their negotiating power;<br> | | '''Making it harder for injured people''' to use "class action" procedures which strengthen their negotiating power;<br> |
| '''Making it more difficult''' to introduce new scientific research in injury cases through expert witnesses;<br>
| | * |
| '''Limiting the liability of corporations''' by changing the rules for apportioning fault and thus limiting recover;<br>
| | * |
| '''Limiting the ability of Americans to sue for injuries''' where the cause or effect was not known until much later;
| | * |
| '''Changing the rules about where an injured American can sue''' and the process for appealing a ruling;<br>
| | * |
| '''Limiting liability for injuries or death to Americans from defective products''' if a product is approved by the government (even though many regulatory agencies have been captured through the revolving door between government and the industries being regulated, many of the same industries pushing these bills);<br>
| | * |
| '''Limiting the power of Congress to create national rules to protect Americans''', no matter their state residence, if injured by defective corporate products distributed nationally; and, among other things,<br>
| |
| '''Limiting the power of courts''' in personal injury cases.
| |
| | |
| <!-- | | <!-- |
| -------------------------Helpful Resources------------------------> | | -------------------------Helpful Resources------------------------> |
| Line 171: |
Line 168: |
| ------ | | ------ |
| <h3>Some of this Corporate Agenda Has Already Become Law</h3> | | <h3>Some of this Corporate Agenda Has Already Become Law</h3> |
| [[Image:Wisconsin.png|left|90px]]'''Controversial Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an alum of ALEC, proposed changes to the law from the ALEC corporate wish list on tort reform as one of his first acts as governor in January 2011.''' Those measures, in Wisconsin Bill 2, passed before people woke up to his radical agenda once he tried to force through dramatic changes to limit the rights of workers in the state in February. The changes to personal injury law Walker pushed through include X, Y, and Z (PLACEHOLDER). '''After Governor Walker changed the rights of injured Wisconsin residents as ALEC corporations had called for, ALEC publicly applauded Walker's actions.''' To learn more about this story, click here (PLACEHOLDER) (Have any of these bills been introduced or enacted in YOUR state? If so, please add that information to the ALEC Exposed page on your state by searching for your state's name in the search engine at the top of this page.) | | [[Image:Wisconsin.png|left|90px]]'''Controversial Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an alum of ALEC, proposed changes to the law from the ALEC corporate wish list on tort reform as one of his first acts as governor in January 2011.''' |
| | PLACEHOLDER |
| | | |
| ------ | | ------ |
| <h3>Limiting Damages for the Loss of Your Child, Spouse, or Parent</h3> | | <h3>Limiting Damages for the Loss of Your Child, Spouse, or Parent</h3> |
| [[Image:Family.png|left|90px]]One of the corporate-politician proposals of ALEC would limit the ability of a family to recover for emotional damages due to the death or injury of a loved one. (LINK) This type of legislation basically makes working class or poor people's lives--as well as the elderly--worth less to their families because any damages for pain and suffering due to the death of a child, spouse, or parent would be limited to an amount equal to their loved one's lost earnings and medical expenses. These kind of corporate provisions try to prevent a jury of YOUR peers from awarding you damages for all you have lost or suffered AFTER a jury finds that your loved one's death was the result of corporate negligence, misconduct, or greed. '''Is a local legislator who was elected to represent YOU actually protecting the profits of global corporate wrongdoers through such legislation instead of YOU and YOUR FAMILY?''' | | [[Image:Family.png|left|90px]]One of the corporate-politician proposals of ALEC would limit the ability of a family to recover for emotional damages due to the death or injury of a loved one. (LINK) |
| | PLACEHOLDER |
| | |
|
| |
|
| ------ | | ------ |
| <h3>Barring Corporate Liability for Killing Your Dog or Cat</h3> | | <h3>Barring Corporate Liability for Killing Your Dog or Cat</h3> |
| [[Image:Pet.png|left|90px]]In addition to limiting the rights of people injured by corporations, under the guise of limiting "frivolous" litigation in 2006, one of the proposals would make it harder for you to obtain any compensation from a company whose negligence killed your family pet.(LINK) In 2009, Americans learned that many U.S. pet food companies had shipped the production of food for their four-legged companions overseas and that Chinese contractors had contaminated the pet food with melamine in order to increase profit margins, resulting in the death and serious injuries of numerous dogs and cats in the U.S. '''If passed in your state, ALEC's corporation-backed proposal would make it very difficult for YOU to recover any damages for the loss of your beloved animal companion due to corporate negligence or misconduct in manufacturing food for America's beloved pets.''' | | [[Image:Pet.png|left|90px]]In addition to limiting the rights of people injured by corporations, under the guise of limiting "frivolous" litigation in 2006, one of the proposals would make it harder for you to obtain any compensation from a company whose negligence killed your family pet.(LINK) PLACEHOLDER |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
