Environment, Energy, and Agriculture: Difference between revisions
Lisa Graves (talk | contribs) update |
Lisa Graves (talk | contribs) update |
||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
''For a full list of bills from this section, [[Bills Affecting our Water, Air, & Land|click here]]'' | ''For a full list of bills from this section, [[Bills Affecting our Water, Air, & Land|click here]]'' | ||
{{Helpful Resources}} | {{Helpful Resources}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 112: | Line 109: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="color:#000000;" | <div style="padding:2px 5px;"> | | style="color:#000000;" | <div style="padding:2px 5px;"> | ||
<h3>Eliminating Democratic Land Use Controls</h3> | <h3>Eliminating Democratic Land Use Controls</h3> | ||
[[Image:zoning.jpg|left|120px]] One model bill from ALEC's member corporations would repeal ALL land use planning and zoning for rural counties by both county and state governments. Under this bill, property could be used for any purpose, without regard for single-family, agricultural, or industrial zoning, or environmental land use restrictions. | [[Image:zoning.jpg|left|120px]] One model bill from ALEC's member corporations would repeal ALL land use planning and zoning for rural counties by both county and state governments. Under this bill, property could be used for any purpose, without regard for single-family, agricultural, or industrial zoning, or environmental land use restrictions. | ||
Line 128: | Line 124: | ||
----- | ----- | ||
<h3>Prohibiting Local Efforts to Ensure Safe Food</h3> | <h3>Prohibiting Local Efforts to Ensure Safe Food</h3> | ||
[[Image:GMO.jpg|right|120px]]Another [http://www.alecexposed.org/w/images/f/f0/3A9-State_Pesticide_Preemption_Act_Exposed.pdf model bill] from ALEC's member corporations prohibits local, city or county governments from limiting pesticide use, requiring that communities do whatever officials in the state capitol decide to allow in distant towns. [http://www.alecexposed.org/w/images/8/3A3-Biotechnology_State_Uniformity_Resolution_Exposed.pdf Another bill] places the same restrictions on local efforts to restrict bio-engineered and GMO crops. If these model bills become law, local governments would be prohibited from responding to their community's concerns about pesticide use or the dangers of GMO crops. ALEC allegedly supports "federalism," or state's rights -- a theory premised on the idea that state government can better represent and respond to local interests than a more centralized federal government. But ALEC apparently does not apply this logic to relations between local and state government. <div> | [[Image:GMO.jpg|right|120px]]Another [http://www.alecexposed.org/w/images/f/f0/3A9-State_Pesticide_Preemption_Act_Exposed.pdf model bill] from ALEC's member corporations prohibits local, city or county governments from limiting pesticide use, requiring that communities do whatever officials in the state capitol decide to allow in distant towns. [http://www.alecexposed.org/w/images/8/3A3-Biotechnology_State_Uniformity_Resolution_Exposed.pdf Another bill] places the same restrictions on local efforts to restrict bio-engineered and GMO crops. If these model bills become law, local governments would be prohibited from responding to their community's concerns about pesticide use or the dangers of GMO crops. ALEC allegedly supports "federalism," or state's rights -- a theory premised on the idea that state government can better represent and respond to local interests than a more centralized federal government. But ALEC apparently does not apply this logic to relations between local and state government. | ||
----- | |||
<h3>Some of this Corporate Agenda Has Already Become Law</h3> | |||
[[Image:Wisconsin.png|left|90px]] Wisconsin Governor and ALEC alumni Scott Walker included language in the 2011 budget bill designed to end mandatory recycling programs for Wisconsin communities. More than 1,000 municipalities in Wisconsin rely on a small landfill tax to fund local recycling programs. Walker wanted to use the money collected from the landfill tax for a new, privatized economic development agency. The proposal outraged county leaders and administrators as well as Republican legislators. Republican State Rep. John Nygren questioned whether the budget measure would really save money in the long run, when balanced with the increased cost of maintaining and building expensive new landfills. The Governor’s actions made no financial sense, but they did comport with ALEC’s [http://www.alecexposed.org/w/images/2/28/3J0-Resolution_on_Packaging_and_the_Municipal_Solid_Waste_Stream_Exposed.pdf Resolution on Packaging and the Municipal Solid Waste Stream], which criticizes "interfering government mandates” and promotes a free market approach to waste removal and recycling. In the end, cost-effective recycling prevailed in Wisconsin. Learn more here (LINK). | |||
<div> | |||
|} | |} | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 04:00, 10 July 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|