|
|
Line 152: |
Line 152: |
| ------ | | ------ |
| <h3>Some of this Corporate Agenda Has Already Become Law</h3> | | <h3>Some of this Corporate Agenda Has Already Become Law</h3> |
| [[Image:Wisconsin.png|left|90px]](PLACEHOLDER)'''Controversial Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an alum of ALEC, proposed changes to the law from the ALEC corporate wish list on tort reform as one of his first acts as governor in January 2011.''' Those measures, in Wisconsin Bill 2, passed before people woke up to his radical agenda once he tried to force through dramatic changes to limit the rights of workers in the state in February. The changes to personal injury law Walker pushed through include X, Y, and Z (PLACEHOLDER). '''After Governor Walker changed the rights of injured Wisconsin residents as ALEC corporations had called for, ALEC publicly applauded Walker's actions.''' To learn more about this story, click here (PLACEHOLDER) (Have any of these bills been introduced or enacted in YOUR state? If so, please add that information to the ALEC Exposed page on your state by searching for your state's name in the search engine at the top of this page.) | | [[Image:Wisconsin.png|left|90px]] '''When current Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker was a state representative, he was an ALEC member and introduced (several?) bills proposed by ALEC, including "Truth in Sentencing."''' Passed in Wisconsin in 1997, the bill requires inmates serve their full sentence without options for parole or supervised release. The program has inflated prison populations and greatly increased the amount of taxpayer dollars spent on prisons (in Wisconsin, to [http://www3.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=277059 an estimated $1.8 billion through 2025]). All of which increases profits for private prison companies like the [http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Corrections_Corporation_of_America Corrections Corporation of America], a member of the ALEC Private Sector board. |
| | |
| | A former head of Wisconsin's prison system (and current University of Wisconsin Law Professor) Walter Dickey told American Radio Works it is "shocking" that lawmakers would write sentencing policy with help from ALEC, a group that gets funding from, and supposedly "expertise" from a private prison corporation. |
| | |
| | "I don't know that they know anything about sentencing," he said. "They know how to build prisons, presumably, since that's the business they're in. They don't know anything about probation and parole. They don't know about the development of alternatives. They don't know about how public safety might be created and defended in communities in this state and other states." |
| | |
| | The Wisconsin state legislature apparently recognized the folly of Truth in Sentencing and rolled-back the law between 2001 and 2009. '''When Scott Walker became governor, he reversed this progress and requested legislation restoring the ALEC corporation-supported Truth in Sentencing, despite the costs to taxpayers and despite claiming Wisconsin was "broke."''' To learn more about this story, [http://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/features/corrections/laws1.html click here] or [http://www3.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=277059 here]. (Have any of these bills been introduced or enacted in YOUR state? If so, please add that information to the ALEC Exposed page on your state by searching for your state's name in the search engine at the top of this page.) |
| | | |
| ------ | | ------ |
| <h3>Limiting Damages for the Loss of Your Child, Spouse, or Parent</h3>
| |
| [[Image:Family.png|left|90px]](PLACEHOLDER)One of the corporate-politician proposals of ALEC would limit the ability of a family to recover for emotional damages due to the death or injury of a loved one. (LINK) This type of legislation basically makes working class or poor people's lives--as well as the elderly--worth less to their families because any damages for pain and suffering due to the death of a child, spouse, or parent would be limited to an amount equal to their loved one's lost earnings and medical expenses. These kind of corporate provisions try to prevent a jury of YOUR peers from awarding you damages for all you have lost or suffered AFTER a jury finds that your loved one's death was the result of corporate negligence, misconduct, or greed. '''Is a local legislator who was elected to represent YOU actually protecting the profits of global corporate wrongdoers through such legislation instead of YOU and YOUR FAMILY?'''
| |
|
| |
| ------
| |
| <h3>Barring Corporate Liability for Killing Your Dog or Cat</h3>
| |
| [[Image:Pet.png|left|90px]](PLACEHOLDER)In addition to limiting the rights of people injured by corporations, under the guise of limiting "frivolous" litigation in 2006, one of the proposals would make it harder for you to obtain any compensation from a company whose negligence killed your family pet.(LINK) In 2009, Americans learned that many U.S. pet food companies had shipped the production of food for their four-legged companions overseas and that Chinese contractors had contaminated the pet food with melamine in order to increase profit margins, resulting in the death and serious injuries of numerous dogs and cats in the U.S. '''If passed in your state, ALEC's corporation-backed proposal would make it very difficult for YOU to recover any damages for the loss of your beloved animal companion due to corporate negligence or misconduct in manufacturing food for America's beloved pets.'''
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |- | | |- |