Tort Reform: Difference between revisions
edit top title |
edit walker section |
||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
-------------------------What the Bills Do------------------------> | -------------------------What the Bills Do------------------------> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#000; font-size:160%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000; text-align:left; color:#FFF; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> | ! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#000; font-size:160%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000; text-align:left; color:#FFF; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">How are corporations avoiding liability in these bills?</h2> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="color:#000;"| | |style="color:#000;"| | ||
Line 169: | Line 169: | ||
------ | ------ | ||
<h3>Some of this Corporate Agenda Has Already Become Law</h3> | <h3>Some of this Corporate Agenda Has Already Become Law</h3> | ||
[[Image:Wisconsin.png|left|90px]]''' | [[Image:Wisconsin.png|left|90px]] '''Wisconsin Governor (and ALEC alum) Scott Walker’s first action upon taking office was to push “tort reform” measures from the ALEC corporate wish list to protect corporations from lawsuits.''' Wisconsin Act 2, passed on a party line vote and signed by Walker in January 2011, bore a strong resemblance to several “tort reform” bills supported by ALEC corporations. For example, Wisconsin Act 2: | ||
* Adopts parts of the ALEC "Punitive Damage Standards Act," limiting the ability to hold corporations accountable for outrageous acts of negligence or recklessness causing injury or death. | |||
* Draws liberally from the ALEC "Product Liability Act," giving corporations free reign to manufacture shoddy products that can wound or maim. A corporation can now escape liability in Wisconsin by showing that the product it manufactured complied with existing regulations, even if the corporation knew the product was dangerous, a standard also reflected in the ALEC "Regulatory Compliance with Liability Act." | |||
* Draws from elements of the "Comparative Fault Act" and "Joint and Several Liability Act" in changing the standards for apportioning fault in a product liability lawsuit. | |||
* Extends liability protections to the nursing home industry (which supported him in the election), using ALEC bills such as the "Non-Economic Damages Act," limiting awards in cases involving for long term health care providers to $750,000 (an increase from the ALEC $250,000 cap) or the amount awarded in economic damages. | |||
*Adopts the ALEC “Reliability in Expert Testimony Standards Act” verbatim, adopting the Daubert standard for the qualifications of people testifying as experts when they give court testimony. | |||
<br>'''After Governor Walker changed the rights of injured Wisconsin residents as ALEC corporations had called for, ALEC publicly applauded Walker's actions.''' | |||
To learn more about this story, click here (PLACEHOLDER) (Have any of these bills been introduced or enacted in YOUR state? If so, please add that information to the ALEC Exposed page on your state by searching for your state's name in the search engine at the top of this page.) | |||
------ | ------ | ||
Line 176: | Line 183: | ||
------ | ------ | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 18:50, 17 June 2011
|
|
|
|